fbpx
Search Results For:

Search Results for: contest – Page 13

Martin Luther King, Jr., espoused a worldview repugnant to many of those who now claim his legacy.
Meet the academics who try to redefine pedophilia as “intergenerational intimacy.”
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Board of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ABOG) are restricting opportunities for health-care professionals to object to abortion and contraception on grounds of conscience. This will accelerate the growing problem of physician shortage.
Private property should be preserved and protected because of its deep contribution to human well-being.
Political legitimization of “private” sexual and marital choices causes much public harm. We have been personally harmed by the regimes of abortion and easy divorce.
John Locke is a deep cultural well from which we still can draw good water.
Judging from the media’s response to Rick Perry’s Galileo reference in the Reagan debate, our discourse is still governed by the modern view that science and religion can only clash.
As the proponents of assisted suicide strive to legalize it in Massachusetts, we should take another look at their arguments and the deceptions therein.
What makes September 11th worthy of public memorializing is that it was not only an event in the lives of these individuals and their families; it was an event in the life of the American nation, an attack aimed at the American nation.
Public officials—especially the President—are obligated to protect the intrinsic equal dignity of all human beings, regardless not only of sex and race, but also without regard to age, size, condition of dependency, vulnerability, or the esteem of others. Abortion and embryo-destructive research are profound and lethal violations of this principle of equality to which the law (and the President) must respond.
The balanced budget amendment would rob the federal government of an essential power.
In a discipline whose point is dispassionate reasoning and discourse, some would shut down debate and silence dissenters on a deep and complex moral-political issue. And the view they would anathematize, far from irrational, is more coherent and more compelling than their slippery and ill-defined 'default'.
When we debate problems of social justice, we must keep our shared principles separate from the means we advocate to recognize them. Failure to do so produces unfruitful discourse and misdirected charges.
A notion of “social practice” should guide the way we think about morality and politics. The first in a three-part series.
A healthy democracy depends on people of conviction working hard to advance their ideas in the public square—respectfully and peacefully, but vigorously and without apologies. We cannot simultaneously serve the poor and accept the legal killing of unborn children.
America has an obligation to look after its own interests.
Have progressives abandoned the liberty of conscience?
When a woman claims to be a man, should the university and the press play along?
Abortion law is usually seen as a matter of constitutional law. Is it time for that to change?
The science of fetal pain remains uncertain, but we still have a duty to avoid the possibility of inflicting undue suffering.
Accepting the “liberal” definition on pregnancy can actually help clarify the morality of contraception, abortion, and embryo adoption.
We shouldn’t worry about America becoming an empire—a new book explains that it has been one for a long, long time.
Our struggle to identify the sort of diversity that is conducive to a vibrant, participatory, and just society is primarily a political inquiry, not a constitutional one.
The new health care law has endangered longstanding protections on conscience. We must act to address them or risk creating a dangerous precedent.