fbpx
Search Results For:

Search Results for: piece – Page 23

Religious communities are an essential part of the fabric of America, even over and above the vital services they provide to weak and vulnerable members of our communities; we must protect their conscience rights against legal coercion.
In developing their positions on Supreme Court appointments and the Department of Justice, presidential candidates should 1) welcome the battle over the Supreme Court, 2) determine to fight hard for high-quality justices, 3) frame the argument for why abortion policy should be restored to the democratic processes, 4) support the Defense of Marriage Act, and 5) commit to select senior legal leaders who fully embrace their goals and priorities.
Introducing a Public Discourse symposium on the 2012 election.
Prejudices of secular and religious groups alike stand in the way of successful crime reduction efforts.
John Locke is an illustration of how social contract theory distorts sound political reasoning.
The new, pro-contraceptive recommendations by the Institute of Medicine endanger the health and well-being of women.
A recent Supreme Court case reveals a division amongst conservatives over the moral foundations of the law.
To take offense does not free us from further argument or criticism. Instead, offense demands ongoing criticism between partners in ethical discourse as a recognition of their fundamental human equality.
Those who care for the severely disabled and dependent testify to our sense that they are part of the human community.
Metaphysics provides the crucial foundation for natural law, and our current intellectual climate is ripe for embracing metaphysical foundations once again. The third in a three-part series.
Acts are not made good or bad by our mere say-so. We must also examine the objective intention of our actions. The second in a three-part series.
A notion of “social practice” should guide the way we think about morality and politics. The first in a three-part series.
Zoning codes used to favor settlement patterns scaled for human beings. No longer.
A historian looks at how one man sought to serve both truth and love.
The Live Action case is very different from the Nazis-at-the-door problem, but lying is justified in neither situation.
Not everything need be seen as ideological.
The pro-life cause must be advanced by truth and by love, and it must be willing to engage in self-criticism when it fails to meet its own exacting standards.
An appreciation for the naturalness of form can lead us back from the politicization of poetry.
Repealing health care is the next fight in the battle for life.
An uncertain legal landscape puts future prosperity at risk.
Do pro-lifers care about life after birth?
A response to Northwestern Law Professor Andrew Koppelman.
We need a healthcare law that is not only pro-life but that also addresses our healthcare system’s persistent problems and looming challenges.
Abortion law is usually seen as a matter of constitutional law. Is it time for that to change?