fbpx
Search Results For:

Search Results for: dance – Page 28

The health-care debate presents us with a moral imperative to solve an economic problem, but how we solve this economic problem has moral implications: allowing individuals and families greater freedom to choose among treatment options in a market that drives down costs, or establishing centralized control that makes utilitarian calculations of the worth of different people’s lives.
Religious communities are an essential part of the fabric of America, even over and above the vital services they provide to weak and vulnerable members of our communities; we must protect their conscience rights against legal coercion.
Public officials—especially the President—are obligated to protect the intrinsic equal dignity of all human beings, regardless not only of sex and race, but also without regard to age, size, condition of dependency, vulnerability, or the esteem of others. Abortion and embryo-destructive research are profound and lethal violations of this principle of equality to which the law (and the President) must respond.
New York’s new sex education mandate excludes abstinence-only options and forces all city school children to learn about “safe sex” in the sixth and seventh grades.
A recent Supreme Court case reveals a division amongst conservatives over the moral foundations of the law.
Our current economic debates underscore the case for an approach to political economy that rejects social contract theory and embraces a robust conception of human flourishing.
Those who care for the severely disabled and dependent testify to our sense that they are part of the human community.
A notion of “social practice” should guide the way we think about morality and politics. The first in a three-part series.
Learning from a religious skeptic’s rejection of polygamy and easy divorce.
Cohabitation does not serve the “best interest” of children, regardless of what the courts say.
Prominent bioethicists Arthur Caplan and Robert P. George on the danger of discounting ethics and overselling science.
A person bears moral responsibility for the foreseeable side effects of his reckless actions.
The part of the Muslim tradition usually cited in support of killing apostates has been gravely misunderstood.
John Locke’s philosophy gives no support to those who would seek to endorse same-sex civil marriage.
Repealing health care is the next fight in the battle for life.
An uncertain legal landscape puts future prosperity at risk.
Defenders of marriage should draw hope and courage from the pro-life movement’s success.
Speaking out requires humility as well as courage.
One scientist’s flawed argument for flawless humans.
The public spaces where we live and work and relax have a real, if subtle, impact on how each of us experiences and reflects on our world.
In his latest book, law professor David A. Strauss attacks the idea of originalism and champions the “living Constitution.” Matt Franck explains why he’s wrong.
The controversy over the so-called “Ground Zero mosque” cannot be understood apart from the history of other communities and their struggles to overcome religious intolerance. And no one should exploit such fears for quick partisan gain.
Re-examining the essential characteristics of marriage.
Kagan’s advocacy for a living constitution should kill her Supreme Court chances.