fbpx
Search Results For:

Search Results for: someone – Page 39

John Locke is an illustration of how social contract theory distorts sound political reasoning.
In a discipline whose point is dispassionate reasoning and discourse, some would shut down debate and silence dissenters on a deep and complex moral-political issue. And the view they would anathematize, far from irrational, is more coherent and more compelling than their slippery and ill-defined 'default'.
Race and sex play qualitatively different roles in our interactions with each other, making sex rationally relevant to our social and political policies in a way that race is not.
The body has a language of its own, and the sexual revolution is founded upon a lie.
To take offense does not free us from further argument or criticism. Instead, offense demands ongoing criticism between partners in ethical discourse as a recognition of their fundamental human equality.
Those who care for the severely disabled and dependent testify to our sense that they are part of the human community.
Zoning codes used to favor settlement patterns scaled for human beings. No longer.
Rather than trying to escape our bodies, we should see that our bodies make union with another possible.
Only an ethics rooted in the divinely revealed truth of creation-as-gift and creator-as-love can coherently and adequately make sense of the universal experience of ought.
How and why considering distribution will yield a complete economic science. The second in a two-part series.
The King & Spalding skedaddle is a blow to the institutional integrity of our legal system. Intimidation is now the default tactic of same-sex marriage advocates.
Learning from a religious skeptic’s rejection of polygamy and easy divorce.
Virtue can only be lived out in communities. But which communities are best suited to promoting virtue?
Prominent bioethicists Arthur Caplan and Robert P. George on the role of bioethics in a democracy and the dangers of eugenics.
Prominent bioethicists Arthur Caplan and Robert P. George on the danger of discounting ethics and overselling science.
A healthy democracy depends on people of conviction working hard to advance their ideas in the public square—respectfully and peacefully, but vigorously and without apologies. We cannot simultaneously serve the poor and accept the legal killing of unborn children.
Not only those with a “future-like-ours,” but all human beings possess equal basic rights.
There is an intrinsic link between marriage and procreation, but this does not mean that infertile couples cannot really be married.
A new book provides the most comprehensive, up-to-date, and even-handed presentation of the abortion argument.
An anti-bullying program’s political slant leads one mother to reflect on the real meaning of diversity and dignity.
Roe v. Wade could prove an unlikely source of pro-life conscience protection.
The Live Action case is very different from the Nazis-at-the-door problem, but lying is justified in neither situation.
All lying is immoral, but not all false utterances are lies.
Lying, even for laudable reasons, is wrong.